Public Company Merger - Public Reverse Merger And Reverse IPO

Filed Under (Legal) by James Scott on 21-07-2010

If you are trying to raise capital with a PPM or public entity like OTCBB you need to understand the mind of the investor. After the business plan sells the investor on the business concept you need to sell them on you and your executive staff. You need to stack your executive positions with professionals with a proven track record of success and possess a solid reputation in the industry. You must paint the picture for investors that your business is run by the who’s who in your industry and this pedigree is demonstrated by your education, degree, grades in college, professional organizations of which you have been and are currently a member, advisory board positions with other corporate organizations, a track record of setting up and maintaining strategic alliances, networking contacts and more.

When an investor looks at your human resource list on your PPM, business plan or public offering docs it needs to scream power, authority and confidence. Each individual that you place on your advisory board must have a massive contribution other than ‘advice’. Advisors should be able to prove their ability to assist in crucial decisions, connect your company with strategic partners and help you get to the next level.

Your legal counsel and CPA should be well known organizations with a long list of successful, well known organizations on their client roster and they should have a lot more to offer your company than just their fee based services. Again, these organizations should be able to set you up with partnerships that will help grow your business. As far as corporate awareness you must include a publicist. The publicist that you choose must be well versed in their comprehension of your industry genre.

They must be able to take your company and get you in front of the proper audience that is conducive to enhancing your growth potential. They must be able to demonstrate their knowledge of viral online marketing as well as traditional means of radio, TV and article promotion. They should be able to reach into their contact list and set you up with one interview after another targeting your specific audience.

These are just a few things to take into consideration when you jump on the fund raising trail. Every individual you have listed on your docs must be able to pass due diligence and have the appeal that reaches into the ‘comfort’ zone portion of the investor’s mind.

15c211 Filing, S1 Filing, Taking Your Company Public and Investor Relations Free Video Download , Take Your Company Public and Globalize Your Business call Princeton Corporate Solutions at 267-233-0183 Free Video Take Your Company Public and Expand Globally FAST We Can Make Global Growth Happen For Your Company

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed

Taking A Company Public: Is Business A Form Of Warfare?

Filed Under (Legal) by James Scott on 08-07-2010

So is business a form of warfare? If it is who are the pawns and who are the kings? Let’s look at the facts and past the 1980s clichs that chant: Greed Is Good and Business Is War as those chanting these phrases are often on the sidelines and not gifted enough to be on the field and playing and have no choice but to live vicariously through those they are jealously watching.

Everyone wants to be a player but in this industry you need a lot more than drive you need connections and capability. By connections I mean global political, global corporate, international finance and more. By capability I mean nerves of steel, the ability to bath in acid and swim with sharks and eat class for breakfast. This is one of the most stressful industries I know of with a burnout rate that is off the charts and any other global consultant that I know has struggled with their demons to stay on the top of their game. Business, by all categorical definition is War.

There are winners, losers, economies rise and economies crumble all because of global commerce. Global commerce as you know is control over the masses by an elite few. The elite are not the government officials as they themselves are pawns in a much larger game that even they don’t understand. Commerce and finance are numbers on a computer screen and fractional reserve lending, the IMF and other organizations at the end of marionette strings to impose the will of the elite on the global populace.

War in the form of economics is ongoing whereas war with guns and the military is to make a statement. Economic warfare is trade sanctions and limiting technology that will enable a developing nation to grow which will disable their industrial capabilities so that instead of a thriving economy they are dependent on the involvement by industrialized nations. With the Bretton Woods Convention in 1944 and the reconstruction of Europe and the doing away with the gold standard the above mentioned Numbers On A Screen are dictated by who holds the most economic collateral to enforce their idea of numbers.

This group of elites has the economic and military power to impose its will and enforce the idea that the numbers that they place on that screen are etched in stone and if those numbers demonstrate a Loan to a developing nation, though no actual empirical capital has been transferred, that developing nation now becomes a willing pawn in the overall game of economic warfare. So there you have it, business is indeed a form of warfare. This industry of global finance serves as the royal court while those around us are forced to play by the rules we invent and enforce.

I’m not saying that this is a good thing, I’m not exactly proud to be part of the problem but this is the awkward reality. I know you’re waiting for a happy ending or an idea that will help create a solution but I don’t have one.

When my firm is brought in as a strategist and alliance facilitator for global rollups, acquisitions, mergers and IPOs we try to create as many jobs as possible but let me ask you, by creating more jobs are we just perpetuating the problem of the masses being controlled by the few?

Take Your Company Public , call Princeton Corporate Solutions at 267-233-0183 Free Video Secrets To Becoming A World Class CEO We Can Make Global Growth Happen For Your Company

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed

Commercial Construction Juegos 3d Commercial Property | Trademark - Trademark Clearance Not An Option For Internet Businesses Looking To Avoid Trademark Infringement

Filed Under (Legal) by guestauthor on 11-06-2010

commercial construction Any person or business entity offering any type of good or service on the Internet today must be aware of the importance of trademark law. In particular, whether it is the use of a domain name, the use of a trademark to identify certain goods, or the use of a service mark to identify particular services, such uses are likely to implicate federal trademark law. This is because the Internet is everywhere, which means your prospective customers, existing customers, and competitors are everywhere. While in the past an individual or business entity could operate its store or offer its service only within a certain geographical location, the Internet has made businesses international. As such, not only may you now qualify for a federal trademark or service mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, but you may also be at risk of trademark infringement due to your use of a third party’s mark in interstate commerce.

juegos 3d The USPTO has a body known as the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. This board, commonly referred to as the TTAB, handles trademark oppositions based upon a variety of reasons. For example, the registration of the pending mark in this case would be challenged because it is confusing similar to an existing mark to which you claim prior rights. However, there are other reasons that a trademark may be opposed during the opposition period, such as the fact that it is generic, disparaging, or fraudulent. Regardless, you only have 30 days within which to file a notice of opposition with the TTAB. This 30-day period is known as the opposition period. This opposition period occurs when the pending trademark application is published for opposition in what is known as the Official Gazette.

commercial property If your goal is to ensure that your mark remains protected and enforceable and that there is no consumer confusion in the marketplace, you must decide how to approach this infringing use. While a trademark infringement lawsuit pursuant to the Lanham Act in federal court is an option, it is important that you also consider a TTAB opposition proceeding. The opposition proceeding allows one to file a notice of opposition, which is akin to a complaint in litigation, and show why the mark should not be registered. The administrative proceeding is similar to litigation in that there are requirements under the federal rules which within the TTAB are referred to specifically as its Trademark Rules of Practice. Once the notice of opposition is filed, a typical opposition proceeding will include the following:

A trademark clearance, also known as a trademark availability assessment, allows a qualified trademark attorney to review and analyze current uses of your particular trademark as well as those that may create a likelihood of confusion, which equates to trademark infringement. While a search of the USPTO Database will reveal pending applications and registrations, it is also important to understand that common law trademark rights may be sufficient to create problems for a business. As such, any prior use of a mark that is likely to cause confusion with your mark needs to be identified and analyzed. Ultimately, failure to do so may result in you having invested significant time, marketing and advertising dollars, and effort to create your business and associated brand only to discover that a third party has prior rights to the trademark or service mark you use.

While ultimately you would not only want to ensure that they did not receive a trademark with the USPTO, you would also want to ensure that all use stopped. While an order from court of law would be required to ensure that all use stops or to collect monetary damages, a TTAB ruling may be the impetus necessary to cause the alleged trademark infringer to cease all use of the mark. More importantly, it is often cheaper than trademark litigation and brings all issues immediately to the attention of the parties involved so as to enable the possibility of a resolution. Therefore, a TTAB trademark opposition should be considered as part of any trademark owner’s enforcement strategy You can be published without charge. You can to republish this article in your website or blog. Please provide links Active.

Add this to : Digg! Digg it Bookmark! Save to Del.icio.us Subscribe to RSS Subscribe to My RSS feed